Stunning 18
Your Pages Recently Viewed
Your Content Recently Viewed

_fer_realz_ Comments

  • 0

It's too bad we hardly ever get to see Kalisy's lovely lady parts because she has to have her fingers inserted or spreading it almost all the time in this video. It's Hustler-style photography, which I always felt MA network sites were better than. Just my two cents worth.

  • 0

The pussy is such a beautiful thing that showing her manipulating, inserting or covering it with her fingers doesn't make it more sexy, it actually conceals our view and makes it less sexy.

I don't know why "Hustler"-style photography is considered sexy, I have always considered it the opposite of sexy.

  • 0

Ack! Pthhhhtttt!

Water sets! Yuk!

  • 0

Antonio, you were doing great, until Eva's panties came off and the fingers were in almost every shot. We want to see the model's pussy, not her fingers. We can see pretty girls' fingers everyday ~ we cannot see their pussys. (: You can do erotic and sexy photography without bringing your site down to the level of Hustler magazine. (:

  • 0

Lovely set, thanks, Antonio and Nicole! But not enough shots of Nicole in the panties from behind, with the panties still on. Hands and Knees and FD/AU shots with the panties still on would have been appreciated. (:

  • 0

Why ruin what would have been a lovely photoset of Kalisy with all the finger action? It just looks like you're trying to copy Hustler. Stunning18 can be so much better than Hustler.

  • 0

When are we ever going to see a set of this gorgeous, sexy model WITHOUT fingers in every shot obstructing our view of her pussy?

These sets exemplify just exactly why I stopped buying American porn where every shot has to have a spread or inserted pussy and you never get to see the pussy itself.

If I wanted insertion or spread shots, I would buy Hustler. I come here for something better.

  • 0

When are we ever going to see a set of this gorgeous, sexy model WITHOUT fingers in every shot obstructing our view of her pussy?

This set exemplifies why I stopped buying American porn where every shot has to have a spread or inserted pussy and you never get to see the pussy itself.

If I wanted insertion or spread shots, I would buy Hustler. I come here for something better.

  • 0

What's with all the fingers lately ~ is this Stunning18, or is this Hustler?

  • 0

Please stop ruining the best photos of the best poses by putting the model's fingers in the way.

  • 0

Too much fingering and spreading. I want to see a model's pussy, not her fingers and not spreading or penetration. If I wanted to see spreading and penetration, I'd buy Hustler.

  • 1

Antonio Clemens, this model is gorgeous. Please shoot some sets with her where she does not play with her pussy.

I want to see some sets of this model where I can see her pussy rather than her fingers. Thank you.

  • 0

Whoops, I promise I didn't read your comment before posting mine... LOL We seem to be in agreement.

  • 2

"Wet Pussy" ? There was a pussy in this shoot? I couldn't see one, too many fingers in the way in EVERY. SINGLE. SHOT.

It sure would be nice to see a shoot with this model where we could see her pussy.

  • 1

Please, no more shots where the models' fingers obstruct our view of their pussies.

  • 3

Please give us a photoset of the lovely Arya where her fingers aren't obstructing our view of her lovely pussy in every shot, thank you.

If I wanted to see a photoset of a girl's fingers in her pussy, I'd buy a copy of Hustler.

  • 0

It would seem that Antonio Clemens has discovered a muse in Tony Murano's old MA sets.

Except, Tony Murano never used Hustler-style finger-spreads to conceal his model's sweetest bits.

  • 3

You make your points well, Fozzinsky. I got so frustrated by years of American porn mags that feature absolutely lovely models but ruin almost every single shot because they mandate that the model be spreading in every shot. I got so sick and tired of that style that it was a true miracle of pleasure to discover MA and its family sites, which at the time I subscribed (2010) did not feature fingers or toys in pics.

I felt that it was a way of making an erotic statement: we don't have to use cheap tricks to make our photos more exciting because our models are exciting and sexy enough. No tricks, no feigned sexual pleasure, just the pleasure of viewing our models unobstructed.

Now in 2016 virtually every MA family site is featuring more and more finger photos and it is frustrating as hell to me. I know that the MA management see this as a move forward but I see it as a diminishment of a beautiful product, a step backwards.

The finger photos are yet another way of making the undisputed leader of the industry just another cheap porn product, IMO.

  • 3

Why ruin what would be a good set by having the model obstruct our views by putting her fingers on and in her pussy? We want to see her pussy, not her fingers.

  • 3

If I wanted to see finger-spread photography, I'd buy a copy of Hustler. This is disappointing. Stunning18 is so much better than Hustler, at least until it starts using the same techniques.

  • 0

Too many fingers. I can look at pretty girls' fingers any day anywhere I am. What I want to see here is her pussy, not her fingers.

  • 0

Gorgeous model. This could have been an excellent photoset rather than just a nice one.

1) What's with all the fingers? All the sudden all the MA family sites are turning into Hustler-wannabe sites. I like MA and I liked the MA sites because I could clearly see the models' features without the fingers being in all the shots. You are so much better than Hustler, PLEASE don't turn into a Hustler wannabe site.

2) Beautiful outfit ~ pretty dress, sexy undies and heels. BUT no upskirt shots. The shoes are removed almost immediately. The thong is removed before we can even see the model's bottom in the thong.

This could have been an excellent set but for the attempt to imitate the American finger-spread style of porn which is cheap and obscures the models' features, and the haste to remove the clothing and heels.

  • 0

Toys, or fingers ~ if it covers up her pussy, it ruins the photoshoot.

  • 0

Yes! So lovely to see Tamara!

NOoooooo!!! Fingers?!? Don't tell me Stunning18 is turning into another fingers porn site? I got so sick and tired of American porn because in every single picture, the model has to be touching, spreading or penetrating herself with her fingers. MA and all the MA "family" sites were such a relief because we could finally see the model without having her fingers in the way ~ now all the family sites are going over to finger porn. *sigh*

  • 0

Too bad we never get to see April's pussy. I can see a pretty girl's fingers any day of the week.

  • 0

Please don't let excessive finger action become the trend here at Stunning 18.... I can see beautiful women's fingers any day of the week, all I have to do is go to class or go to work. (: What I don't get to see is their lovely private parts, and in a photoset, when fingers get involved, the private parts get obscured.

Of course not everyone agrees with me on this, but that's my opinion and my vote. (:

  • 0

Too bad about the fingers, we never got to see Kama's pussy from the front, only from the rear. The panties were extra hot, and the rear views were great but I wanted to see her nice bits from the front as well without fingers blocking the view.

  • 0

Ohhh man I wish I could bump uglies with Dolores... well, bump (my) ugly with her pretty... (;

  • 0

Nicole's lookin' sexy as hell in that lacy thong! Thanks for the extended lingerie sequence!

I would still like to see a more natural-feeling "flow" from one pose to the next, and longer sequences of photos in a pose, as the model moves through it. It still looks like an assortment of poses, rather than a smooth-moving documentary of Nicole moving from one to the next.

  • 0

April's scorching hot. (: This set could easily have been twice as long and I would have been captivated to the end. Much better "flow" in this set than the norm here, it flows really logically through a series of connected movements. I would still like to see more shots of the really nice poses. And unfortunately in the best poses, April's fingers block our view of the nice bits in this set.

  • 1

Some nice spicy poses of a lovely young lady, but the problem is it's way too ADD ~ only 2 to 3 shots in sequence of a given pose, and when it's a nice revealing pose, I want to see a long sequence. And way too many "filler" shots that don't show anything.

As a result, I'm much more frustrated than satisfied by this set. Yes, I'm tantalized. Yes, I'm left wanting more. But I didn't get near enough of what I wanted to see to be satisfied.

  • 0

So many fingers in the way when what I wanted to see was not fingers...

  • 3

Well.... that escalated quickly! An unexpected surprise indeed...

  • 1

Jodie is beautiful and exciting. Goodness, but that bottom of hers is perfect!

I really appreciated the extra-long hands and knees going into FD/AU sequence. Antonio, IMO you should include a lot more of those extended sequences in your sets. Not only FD/AU but also front, standing, spread eagle, etc. etc. It makes the set much more cohesive and less feeling like we're jumping abruptly from one pose to another unrelated pose. (:

  • 1

AKA Niemira on MA... (:

  • 2

AKA Niemira on MA... (:

  • 2

Scorching HOT!

  • 0

Lalovv's masturbation video is the gold standard by which I judge all Stunning18 masturbation videos... this one is very close to that gold standard, or it might match it. I guess I need to watch again to determine.... (:

  • 1

Vivian is sexy as hell! Her makeup and hair are perfect, as is her cute outfit along with the sexy high heels. This is a great introductory set, I hope to see a LOT more of Vivian. (:

  • 0

Antonio, Mona is SPECTACULAR. I hope you keep her around for a long time to come. She's very pretty and has an amazing body. I couldn't help thinking about how much her pussy looks like Melena's... (;

About your sets... I have some criticisms that are appropriate to this particular set. First, you start the model in very cute and provocative clothing but then have her remove it before we can even see how it looks in multiple poses. I was very disappointed the panties came off so soon.

Then, once you have the model remove her clothes, you have her go from pose to pose rather arbitrarily. There is no feeling of "flow" from one pose to another, and even worse, the best poses you only have the model in for two or three pictures rather than having a long sequence of the very nice poses like FD/AU or on her back with her legs spread. The feeling of the entire set ends up being rather choppy and abrupt rather than smooth and flowing. I would like the whole set to flow naturally through the poses and have a smooth feeling of transition from one pose to another ~ i.e. arranging the poses so they seem like a natural progression.

I hope these comments are helpful to you. I genuinely feel you have some spectacular models and you could present them more erotically.

  • 0

Very very sexy! Thanks Susan and Antonio... esp. for the delicious upskirt with stockings and high heels. Great stuff! (;

  • 0

Just a tad heavy on the rouge, otherwise a lovely set of a lovely woman.

  • 0

OMG Thanks for the lovely lingerie shots, especially those pretty panties!!!

  • 1

She's definitely a charmer, and definitely sensual as hell, but OMG that camera work was so awful it had to be intentional.

  • 3

Amelia is absolutely stunning, but it is disappointing that Stunning18 is running so many pussy shy sets lately. It's frustrating to see such gorgeous women and not be able to see all their intimate assets.

  • 1

I agree, Fozzinsky, I hope Olivia comes back soon and often!

  • 1

Wow... what's with all the rail-thin models lately? Mind you, I like a skinny girl like Olivia, who's quite gorgeous... but I like women with meat on their bones and bountiful, generous curves too.

  • 0

Yep, and I'm going to keep asking the question, I hope someday Antonio will answer. I'm sure he's got a reason, I don't expect him to change his practices just for me. But, I just want to hear his reason.

  • 0

Again, I just don't get it, Mr. Clemens...

You've got a gorgeous model in a cute, frilly, flirty dress with a short skirt... and you don't take any upskirt shots? The one shot where she's lifting her skirt is nice, but that's not an upskirt shot.

Otherwise, a very nice set.

  • 0

Yum yum!!!

Antonio, why don't you ever shoot upskirt shots, even when your model is wearing a pretty dress or skirt and reclining on a chair? Do you not like upskirt? Do you feel uncomfortable with it? Or does it just not strike you as erotic?

  • 2

Melena, the incredible cutie who just happens to be a world-class sex kitten... see the final sequence on the chest to see what I mean. I like how she doesn't look as polished or professional in this set and lets a lot of feeling through. Oh, and those polka dot panties are HOT. ( :

  • 2

Wow! Rebecca is just plain flat-out GORGEOUS. I can't wait to see her in a set with flattering lighting. What a figure! What a lovely bottom! What gorgeous legs! And what a pretty face and hair!

  • 0

Poor girl did a horrible shave job. I'd happily have given her a touch-up!

  • 1

Good eye, Antonio, this one's a keeper.

Britney is gorgeous. Just plain gorgeous.

  • 2

Nothin' better than a naughty cute little sweetie just oozing with creamy goodness!

  • 0

I second the PP Club nomination, LLC!!!

  • 0

Antonio, thanks for including the upskirt shots with that cute dress! They were quite delicious... ( :

  • 0

Damn right! That is the prototypical PP!!

  • 0

Pretty face... gorgeous body... fascinating tattoos.... ( ;

  • 1

I'm no fan of that nightmare of a set... but I AM a fan of the model. Holy cow, Diana is gorgeous, and a natural. I hope to see plenty from her. ( :

  • 2

Yes! More Solana!!!

  • 0

Antonio, I'm confused... Lisa's wearing such a pretty skirt and you only took one upskirt shot? It was a really nice shot, but more would be appreciated.

  • 0

The lack of explicit shots is a pity, but Clare is stunningly beautiful and the lingerie + heels combo is PERFECT for her.

BTW, I see comments praising photographs in water sets where the droplets are frozen in time. To be honest, I am not impressed with those shots. However, the shots in this set where Clare is throwing her hair and the camera catches it in mid flight ~ THAT I am impressed with. Despite the lack of explicit, this is a very beautiful set, Antonio.

  • 2

Melena is sheer perfection. This little lady simply cannot take an unflattering photograph.

Thanks to Antonio Clemens for allowing her to do the upskirt tease she is so good at. This was the proper use of a lovely sexy "minidress." ( : I knew you could do it, Antonio!

  • 3

Creamyyyyyummmmmm

  • 3

Photo test?

Harper passes with an A+!

  • 2

Melena is the MAverse's 21st C. Pinup princess.

  • 2

With a miniskirt that cute, why no frontal upskirt?

  • 2

Too many "fingers" shots.... makes it hard to see her intimate parts!

  • 0

I gotta admit I agree with you, l_l_c ~ the name for this set is a total misnomer.

I have no problem at all with G/G sets, even ones not depicting sexual activity. It's nice to see two beautiful female bodies next to and interacting with each other even when the interaction is obviously not sexual. However, the name of this set implies something that is not there, and that is its weakness. Had it merely been entitled "Play" I would have had no problem at all with it.

  • 0

Alice is HOT. You should try her out on MA, Antonio...

  • 1

Alice is AMAZING. Cute, beautiful, sexy, and what a PP. I hope you got plenty of sets with her, Antonio!

  • 0

Funny chair, GORGEOUS woman, with a perfect pussy. And her breasts.... Nice set, I definitely want to see more of Maza!

  • 0

Wow!

A truly magnificent set of a magnificent beauty who is only growing more and more gorgeous with time.

It's hard to believe a set like this could have been better... and yet....

Several lacks or shortcomings of this set, from my POV...

No upskirt; the lovely dress was taken off without any attempt at upskirt peeks.

No panties. A pair of panties matching the stockings and garter belt would have been even better.

The stockings and garter belt and high heels were removed. We have plenty of totally nude sets of Nicole, this set would not have suffered from leaving the stockings, garter belt, and heels on for the rest of the set.

Again, this set was magnificent... but it could have been even better. Nevertheless, I will enjoy it for what it is. ( :

  • 1

Such a lovely lady... everything is sexy about this woman, right down to her voice and her giggle. ( : Once again, I wish I knew how to speak Russian... ( :

  • 1

Not that everything about this woman isn't scorchingly sexy, but damn, her hair is soooo sexy in this set! Mmmm! Katie's such a looker!

I'm not a huge fan of the bow tats, but I have to admit the one on her foot is pretty damn cool. ( :

  • 1

Antonio, THANK YOU for giving us panty lovers a full complement of shots with the pretty panties still on before their removal. It was so nice... and so much more powerful when they do finally come off. This was a lovely set and I love it. ( :

Oh, those high heels are quite lovely as well. And thanks also to the lovely Fannie, for posing for us!!

  • 0

I believe that it is literally impossible for this lady to look not elegant.

From time to time, something very very close to a Mona Lisa smile peeks out, and it is literally breathtaking... of course, everything else she does is breathtaking as well but you get the point...

  • 1

Mmmmm creamy goodness....

  • 1

Stacy is very cute and very sexy. OMG those FD/AU shots were HOT. ( ;

  • 1

One of the very few ways I disagree with you, Hayley... being a tattoo'd person myself, I totally understand why a person would choose to get a tattoo.

It's ALL about the person themselves... an inner desire.

Nothing to do with how they look to the outside world. To get a permanent alteration to your body, it is an intensely personal choice. I deliberated about my tattoo for 3 years, and knew the final design for a full year before I actually got it. ( :

  • 1

On the one hand, I don't really want to encourage non-explicit posing on an explicit site... on the other, is Ellison not seriously the single most beautiful woman on the internets today? ...is it just me?

Her sheer perfection almost makes up for the lack of explicit material. And those shots in just the sexy black heels.... oh heavens...

Technically, I would like to say: Shooting Ellison in a black dress? Brilliant. Shooting Ellison against a black background? Great. But shooting Ellison in a black dress against a black background? The weakest aspect of this set.

  • 1

I think Clemens needs to get a better translation program... in my book, "actually having a butt" and "having the body fat of the average woman" does not translate to "chubby." ( :

  • 1

I think Clemens needs to get a better translation program... in my book, "actually having a butt" and "having the body fat of the average woman" does not translate to "chubby." ( :

  • 0

This little lady really reminds me of Anika from MA a couple of years ago, both in face and body type. I hope we get to see this photoset soon!

  • 0

Lovely, lovely, lovely...

  • 0

Ellison is easily the single most stunningly beautiful woman on this site, IMO. Annett is her only competition.
On the one hand, it's a pity she doesn't do explicit poses.
On the other, I've read that brain researchers have determined that the visual system is wired such that looking at a beautiful woman's face directly stimulates the pleasure center of the brain, hence our obsession with gazing at beautiful faces... like Ellison's. Her beauty is truly world class, IMO.

  • 0

When I saw her first set, I felt that Ellison was easily the single most stunningly beautiful woman on this site. Annett is her only competition, IMO. This film only serves to support that opinion. It's a pity that she doesn't do explicit...

  • 0

I cannot play this movie.

  • 4

Easily the prettiest model on site. Still no real pussy shots... a real shame, but very, very pretty. Almost perfect...

  • 1

Wow! What a fantastically well shaped body this beautiful young lady has!! I'm a big fan already!

  • 0

This movie is inaccessible for streaming or download.

  • 0

Wendy is absolutely adorable... I wish there was a translation or subtitles available!

  • 0

Homecoming/Prom Queen, Miss America Lovely...
Too bad no real pussy shots. *sigh* Oh well, her face and hair and body are so lovely to look at it almost makes up for that lack...

  • 0

Strange ~ but cute ~ name for a very foxy young lady. ( :
One question I have for you though, Clemens... you start her off in the set with an amazingly cute, sexy dress... but do not show any upskirt shots at all even though they would have been very easy with such a short skirt. I don't understand why you showed no upskirt whatsoever or even any of the undressing sequence.

  • 0

EXACTLY, Doug... what the F DO you ~ or I ~ know... actually know... about Kristel? Not even her real name, I wager... much less, anything about any of the photographers or other models.
Not that that's a bad thing.
IMO, they sell their images... that's all we know about them. Everything else is suggestion or projection.
And sometimes our ideas about them reveal much more about ourselves than anything about the models or the photographers.
Which is one reason I prefer not to speculate too deeply about these things. These models are real people with real lives who exist ~ half a world away ~ who I very likely will never meet in real life.
Such is life. For here and now, a surprising number of them give me some joy. ( : I like that, and I don't really invest very much more meaning into it than that.

  • 0

No, just not a native English speaker.

  • 0

Doug, are you forgetting the fact that neither Kristel nor Clemens is a native English speaker? They can hardly be expected to "feel" the connotations of English words the way we do.
Imagine if you were put in charge of coming up with set names in Russian... at best they would sound amusing to a Russian speaker, more likely they would end up sounding offensive.

  • 0

Clemens, I have one question:
With Roza wearing the sexy miniskirt, why did you only shoot one nice upskirt shot (# 21)? You could easily have shot 5 - 10 upskirt shots and still have had plenty of shots without the skirt.

  • 1

Waaay too short... please shoot a longer video of this gorgeous young lady pleasuring herself! ( :

  • 2

Melena is a testament to the power of cute! Her cute personality makes her 1000 X sexier than she'd be if she were dead serious. ( :

  • 1

Great panty shots, particularly from behind while Melena is bent over. More like that in future shoots, please! ( :

  • 1

Cute!!!!!

  • 1

OMG Shanty is soooo sexy in that miniskirt and those stiletto heels! Thank you for the delicious upskirt shots at the beginning of the set ~ upskirt is always sexy, with undies and without. And thanks for leaving the stilettos on for so long! This is a great set of a very sexy woman.

  • 0

Shanna is HOT! I love her smile, her attitude, her personality, and of course her lovely body. I hope a lot more is on the way from this firecracker. ( :

  • 0

This is my favorite video on this site. Incredible!

  • 1

This girl is sooo pretty... any chance of bringing her back for more sets, Antonio?

  • 0

Lovely set of a lovely woman. ( :

  • 0

I see you beat me to it, Doug, and I was going to alert you on MA that Clemens had a set with your lady over here. ( :

  • 0

LOL

  • 0

Halena is a straight-up goddess. She rocks my world, every video, every set.

  • 0

Norma, you are never anything less than absolutely adorable...
I especially loved the upskirt shots, even though there were far too few and none from in front. ( :
Upskirt works really well with such a pretty dress!

  • 0

That's a cute costume, it makes me think of a naughty gymnast or figure skater.... ( :

  • 0

I dream of Barbara dancing a bellydance for me in that costume... ( : ( : ( :

  • 4

Easily the prettiest model on site. Still no real pussy shots... a real shame, but very, very pretty. Almost perfect...

  • 3

Please give us a photoset of the lovely Arya where her fingers aren't obstructing our view of her lovely pussy in every shot, thank you.

If I wanted to see a photoset of a girl's fingers in her pussy, I'd buy a copy of Hustler.

  • 3

You make your points well, Fozzinsky. I got so frustrated by years of American porn mags that feature absolutely lovely models but ruin almost every single shot because they mandate that the model be spreading in every shot. I got so sick and tired of that style that it was a true miracle of pleasure to discover MA and its family sites, which at the time I subscribed (2010) did not feature fingers or toys in pics.

I felt that it was a way of making an erotic statement: we don't have to use cheap tricks to make our photos more exciting because our models are exciting and sexy enough. No tricks, no feigned sexual pleasure, just the pleasure of viewing our models unobstructed.

Now in 2016 virtually every MA family site is featuring more and more finger photos and it is frustrating as hell to me. I know that the MA management see this as a move forward but I see it as a diminishment of a beautiful product, a step backwards.

The finger photos are yet another way of making the undisputed leader of the industry just another cheap porn product, IMO.

  • 3

Why ruin what would be a good set by having the model obstruct our views by putting her fingers on and in her pussy? We want to see her pussy, not her fingers.

  • 3

If I wanted to see finger-spread photography, I'd buy a copy of Hustler. This is disappointing. Stunning18 is so much better than Hustler, at least until it starts using the same techniques.

  • 3

Well.... that escalated quickly! An unexpected surprise indeed...

  • 3

Amelia is absolutely stunning, but it is disappointing that Stunning18 is running so many pussy shy sets lately. It's frustrating to see such gorgeous women and not be able to see all their intimate assets.

  • 3

Creamyyyyyummmmmm

  • 3

Photo test?

Harper passes with an A+!

  • 2

"Wet Pussy" ? There was a pussy in this shoot? I couldn't see one, too many fingers in the way in EVERY. SINGLE. SHOT.

It sure would be nice to see a shoot with this model where we could see her pussy.

  • 2

AKA Niemira on MA... (:

  • 2

Scorching HOT!

  • 2

Melena, the incredible cutie who just happens to be a world-class sex kitten... see the final sequence on the chest to see what I mean. I like how she doesn't look as polished or professional in this set and lets a lot of feeling through. Oh, and those polka dot panties are HOT. ( :

  • 2

Wow! Rebecca is just plain flat-out GORGEOUS. I can't wait to see her in a set with flattering lighting. What a figure! What a lovely bottom! What gorgeous legs! And what a pretty face and hair!

  • 2

Nothin' better than a naughty cute little sweetie just oozing with creamy goodness!

  • 2

Yes! More Solana!!!

  • 2

Melena is sheer perfection. This little lady simply cannot take an unflattering photograph.

Thanks to Antonio Clemens for allowing her to do the upskirt tease she is so good at. This was the proper use of a lovely sexy "minidress." ( : I knew you could do it, Antonio!

  • 2

Melena is the MAverse's 21st C. Pinup princess.

  • 2

With a miniskirt that cute, why no frontal upskirt?

  • 2

Too many "fingers" shots.... makes it hard to see her intimate parts!

  • 2

Melena is a testament to the power of cute! Her cute personality makes her 1000 X sexier than she'd be if she were dead serious. ( :

  • 1

Antonio Clemens, this model is gorgeous. Please shoot some sets with her where she does not play with her pussy.

I want to see some sets of this model where I can see her pussy rather than her fingers. Thank you.

  • 1

Please, no more shots where the models' fingers obstruct our view of their pussies.

  • 1

Some nice spicy poses of a lovely young lady, but the problem is it's way too ADD ~ only 2 to 3 shots in sequence of a given pose, and when it's a nice revealing pose, I want to see a long sequence. And way too many "filler" shots that don't show anything.

As a result, I'm much more frustrated than satisfied by this set. Yes, I'm tantalized. Yes, I'm left wanting more. But I didn't get near enough of what I wanted to see to be satisfied.

  • 1

Jodie is beautiful and exciting. Goodness, but that bottom of hers is perfect!

I really appreciated the extra-long hands and knees going into FD/AU sequence. Antonio, IMO you should include a lot more of those extended sequences in your sets. Not only FD/AU but also front, standing, spread eagle, etc. etc. It makes the set much more cohesive and less feeling like we're jumping abruptly from one pose to another unrelated pose. (:

  • 1

AKA Niemira on MA... (:

  • 1

Vivian is sexy as hell! Her makeup and hair are perfect, as is her cute outfit along with the sexy high heels. This is a great introductory set, I hope to see a LOT more of Vivian. (:

  • 1

She's definitely a charmer, and definitely sensual as hell, but OMG that camera work was so awful it had to be intentional.

  • 1

I agree, Fozzinsky, I hope Olivia comes back soon and often!

  • 1

Wow... what's with all the rail-thin models lately? Mind you, I like a skinny girl like Olivia, who's quite gorgeous... but I like women with meat on their bones and bountiful, generous curves too.

  • 1

Good eye, Antonio, this one's a keeper.

Britney is gorgeous. Just plain gorgeous.

  • 1

I'm no fan of that nightmare of a set... but I AM a fan of the model. Holy cow, Diana is gorgeous, and a natural. I hope to see plenty from her. ( :

  • 1

Alice is AMAZING. Cute, beautiful, sexy, and what a PP. I hope you got plenty of sets with her, Antonio!

  • 1

Such a lovely lady... everything is sexy about this woman, right down to her voice and her giggle. ( : Once again, I wish I knew how to speak Russian... ( :

  • 1

Not that everything about this woman isn't scorchingly sexy, but damn, her hair is soooo sexy in this set! Mmmm! Katie's such a looker!

I'm not a huge fan of the bow tats, but I have to admit the one on her foot is pretty damn cool. ( :

  • 1

Antonio, THANK YOU for giving us panty lovers a full complement of shots with the pretty panties still on before their removal. It was so nice... and so much more powerful when they do finally come off. This was a lovely set and I love it. ( :

Oh, those high heels are quite lovely as well. And thanks also to the lovely Fannie, for posing for us!!

  • 1

Mmmmm creamy goodness....

  • 1

Stacy is very cute and very sexy. OMG those FD/AU shots were HOT. ( ;

  • 1

One of the very few ways I disagree with you, Hayley... being a tattoo'd person myself, I totally understand why a person would choose to get a tattoo.

It's ALL about the person themselves... an inner desire.

Nothing to do with how they look to the outside world. To get a permanent alteration to your body, it is an intensely personal choice. I deliberated about my tattoo for 3 years, and knew the final design for a full year before I actually got it. ( :

  • 1

On the one hand, I don't really want to encourage non-explicit posing on an explicit site... on the other, is Ellison not seriously the single most beautiful woman on the internets today? ...is it just me?

Her sheer perfection almost makes up for the lack of explicit material. And those shots in just the sexy black heels.... oh heavens...

Technically, I would like to say: Shooting Ellison in a black dress? Brilliant. Shooting Ellison against a black background? Great. But shooting Ellison in a black dress against a black background? The weakest aspect of this set.

  • 1

I think Clemens needs to get a better translation program... in my book, "actually having a butt" and "having the body fat of the average woman" does not translate to "chubby." ( :

  • 1

I think Clemens needs to get a better translation program... in my book, "actually having a butt" and "having the body fat of the average woman" does not translate to "chubby." ( :

  • 1

Wow! What a fantastically well shaped body this beautiful young lady has!! I'm a big fan already!

  • 1

Waaay too short... please shoot a longer video of this gorgeous young lady pleasuring herself! ( :

  • 1

Great panty shots, particularly from behind while Melena is bent over. More like that in future shoots, please! ( :

  • 1

Cute!!!!!

  • 1

OMG Shanty is soooo sexy in that miniskirt and those stiletto heels! Thank you for the delicious upskirt shots at the beginning of the set ~ upskirt is always sexy, with undies and without. And thanks for leaving the stilettos on for so long! This is a great set of a very sexy woman.

  • 1

This girl is sooo pretty... any chance of bringing her back for more sets, Antonio?

  • 0

It's too bad we hardly ever get to see Kalisy's lovely lady parts because she has to have her fingers inserted or spreading it almost all the time in this video. It's Hustler-style photography, which I always felt MA network sites were better than. Just my two cents worth.

  • 0

The pussy is such a beautiful thing that showing her manipulating, inserting or covering it with her fingers doesn't make it more sexy, it actually conceals our view and makes it less sexy.

I don't know why "Hustler"-style photography is considered sexy, I have always considered it the opposite of sexy.

  • 0

Ack! Pthhhhtttt!

Water sets! Yuk!

  • 0

Antonio, you were doing great, until Eva's panties came off and the fingers were in almost every shot. We want to see the model's pussy, not her fingers. We can see pretty girls' fingers everyday ~ we cannot see their pussys. (: You can do erotic and sexy photography without bringing your site down to the level of Hustler magazine. (:

  • 0

Lovely set, thanks, Antonio and Nicole! But not enough shots of Nicole in the panties from behind, with the panties still on. Hands and Knees and FD/AU shots with the panties still on would have been appreciated. (:

  • 0

Why ruin what would have been a lovely photoset of Kalisy with all the finger action? It just looks like you're trying to copy Hustler. Stunning18 can be so much better than Hustler.

  • 0

When are we ever going to see a set of this gorgeous, sexy model WITHOUT fingers in every shot obstructing our view of her pussy?

These sets exemplify just exactly why I stopped buying American porn where every shot has to have a spread or inserted pussy and you never get to see the pussy itself.

If I wanted insertion or spread shots, I would buy Hustler. I come here for something better.

  • 0

When are we ever going to see a set of this gorgeous, sexy model WITHOUT fingers in every shot obstructing our view of her pussy?

This set exemplifies why I stopped buying American porn where every shot has to have a spread or inserted pussy and you never get to see the pussy itself.

If I wanted insertion or spread shots, I would buy Hustler. I come here for something better.

  • 0

What's with all the fingers lately ~ is this Stunning18, or is this Hustler?

  • 0

Please stop ruining the best photos of the best poses by putting the model's fingers in the way.

  • 0

Too much fingering and spreading. I want to see a model's pussy, not her fingers and not spreading or penetration. If I wanted to see spreading and penetration, I'd buy Hustler.

  • 0

Whoops, I promise I didn't read your comment before posting mine... LOL We seem to be in agreement.

  • 0

It would seem that Antonio Clemens has discovered a muse in Tony Murano's old MA sets.

Except, Tony Murano never used Hustler-style finger-spreads to conceal his model's sweetest bits.

  • 0

Too many fingers. I can look at pretty girls' fingers any day anywhere I am. What I want to see here is her pussy, not her fingers.

  • 0

Gorgeous model. This could have been an excellent photoset rather than just a nice one.

1) What's with all the fingers? All the sudden all the MA family sites are turning into Hustler-wannabe sites. I like MA and I liked the MA sites because I could clearly see the models' features without the fingers being in all the shots. You are so much better than Hustler, PLEASE don't turn into a Hustler wannabe site.

2) Beautiful outfit ~ pretty dress, sexy undies and heels. BUT no upskirt shots. The shoes are removed almost immediately. The thong is removed before we can even see the model's bottom in the thong.

This could have been an excellent set but for the attempt to imitate the American finger-spread style of porn which is cheap and obscures the models' features, and the haste to remove the clothing and heels.

  • 0

Toys, or fingers ~ if it covers up her pussy, it ruins the photoshoot.

  • 0

Yes! So lovely to see Tamara!

NOoooooo!!! Fingers?!? Don't tell me Stunning18 is turning into another fingers porn site? I got so sick and tired of American porn because in every single picture, the model has to be touching, spreading or penetrating herself with her fingers. MA and all the MA "family" sites were such a relief because we could finally see the model without having her fingers in the way ~ now all the family sites are going over to finger porn. *sigh*

  • 0

Too bad we never get to see April's pussy. I can see a pretty girl's fingers any day of the week.

  • 0

Please don't let excessive finger action become the trend here at Stunning 18.... I can see beautiful women's fingers any day of the week, all I have to do is go to class or go to work. (: What I don't get to see is their lovely private parts, and in a photoset, when fingers get involved, the private parts get obscured.

Of course not everyone agrees with me on this, but that's my opinion and my vote. (:

  • 0

Too bad about the fingers, we never got to see Kama's pussy from the front, only from the rear. The panties were extra hot, and the rear views were great but I wanted to see her nice bits from the front as well without fingers blocking the view.

  • 0

Ohhh man I wish I could bump uglies with Dolores... well, bump (my) ugly with her pretty... (;

  • 0

Nicole's lookin' sexy as hell in that lacy thong! Thanks for the extended lingerie sequence!

I would still like to see a more natural-feeling "flow" from one pose to the next, and longer sequences of photos in a pose, as the model moves through it. It still looks like an assortment of poses, rather than a smooth-moving documentary of Nicole moving from one to the next.

  • 0

April's scorching hot. (: This set could easily have been twice as long and I would have been captivated to the end. Much better "flow" in this set than the norm here, it flows really logically through a series of connected movements. I would still like to see more shots of the really nice poses. And unfortunately in the best poses, April's fingers block our view of the nice bits in this set.

  • 0

So many fingers in the way when what I wanted to see was not fingers...

  • 0

Lalovv's masturbation video is the gold standard by which I judge all Stunning18 masturbation videos... this one is very close to that gold standard, or it might match it. I guess I need to watch again to determine.... (:

  • 0

Antonio, Mona is SPECTACULAR. I hope you keep her around for a long time to come. She's very pretty and has an amazing body. I couldn't help thinking about how much her pussy looks like Melena's... (;

About your sets... I have some criticisms that are appropriate to this particular set. First, you start the model in very cute and provocative clothing but then have her remove it before we can even see how it looks in multiple poses. I was very disappointed the panties came off so soon.

Then, once you have the model remove her clothes, you have her go from pose to pose rather arbitrarily. There is no feeling of "flow" from one pose to another, and even worse, the best poses you only have the model in for two or three pictures rather than having a long sequence of the very nice poses like FD/AU or on her back with her legs spread. The feeling of the entire set ends up being rather choppy and abrupt rather than smooth and flowing. I would like the whole set to flow naturally through the poses and have a smooth feeling of transition from one pose to another ~ i.e. arranging the poses so they seem like a natural progression.

I hope these comments are helpful to you. I genuinely feel you have some spectacular models and you could present them more erotically.

  • 0

Very very sexy! Thanks Susan and Antonio... esp. for the delicious upskirt with stockings and high heels. Great stuff! (;

  • 0

Just a tad heavy on the rouge, otherwise a lovely set of a lovely woman.

  • 0

OMG Thanks for the lovely lingerie shots, especially those pretty panties!!!

  • 0

Yep, and I'm going to keep asking the question, I hope someday Antonio will answer. I'm sure he's got a reason, I don't expect him to change his practices just for me. But, I just want to hear his reason.

  • 0

Again, I just don't get it, Mr. Clemens...

You've got a gorgeous model in a cute, frilly, flirty dress with a short skirt... and you don't take any upskirt shots? The one shot where she's lifting her skirt is nice, but that's not an upskirt shot.

Otherwise, a very nice set.

  • 0

Yum yum!!!

Antonio, why don't you ever shoot upskirt shots, even when your model is wearing a pretty dress or skirt and reclining on a chair? Do you not like upskirt? Do you feel uncomfortable with it? Or does it just not strike you as erotic?

  • 0

Poor girl did a horrible shave job. I'd happily have given her a touch-up!

  • 0

I second the PP Club nomination, LLC!!!

  • 0

Antonio, thanks for including the upskirt shots with that cute dress! They were quite delicious... ( :

  • 0

Damn right! That is the prototypical PP!!

  • 0

Pretty face... gorgeous body... fascinating tattoos.... ( ;

  • 0

Antonio, I'm confused... Lisa's wearing such a pretty skirt and you only took one upskirt shot? It was a really nice shot, but more would be appreciated.

  • 0

The lack of explicit shots is a pity, but Clare is stunningly beautiful and the lingerie + heels combo is PERFECT for her.

BTW, I see comments praising photographs in water sets where the droplets are frozen in time. To be honest, I am not impressed with those shots. However, the shots in this set where Clare is throwing her hair and the camera catches it in mid flight ~ THAT I am impressed with. Despite the lack of explicit, this is a very beautiful set, Antonio.

  • 0

I gotta admit I agree with you, l_l_c ~ the name for this set is a total misnomer.

I have no problem at all with G/G sets, even ones not depicting sexual activity. It's nice to see two beautiful female bodies next to and interacting with each other even when the interaction is obviously not sexual. However, the name of this set implies something that is not there, and that is its weakness. Had it merely been entitled "Play" I would have had no problem at all with it.

  • 0

Alice is HOT. You should try her out on MA, Antonio...

  • 0

Funny chair, GORGEOUS woman, with a perfect pussy. And her breasts.... Nice set, I definitely want to see more of Maza!

  • 0

Wow!

A truly magnificent set of a magnificent beauty who is only growing more and more gorgeous with time.

It's hard to believe a set like this could have been better... and yet....

Several lacks or shortcomings of this set, from my POV...

No upskirt; the lovely dress was taken off without any attempt at upskirt peeks.

No panties. A pair of panties matching the stockings and garter belt would have been even better.

The stockings and garter belt and high heels were removed. We have plenty of totally nude sets of Nicole, this set would not have suffered from leaving the stockings, garter belt, and heels on for the rest of the set.

Again, this set was magnificent... but it could have been even better. Nevertheless, I will enjoy it for what it is. ( :

  • 0

I believe that it is literally impossible for this lady to look not elegant.

From time to time, something very very close to a Mona Lisa smile peeks out, and it is literally breathtaking... of course, everything else she does is breathtaking as well but you get the point...

  • 0

This little lady really reminds me of Anika from MA a couple of years ago, both in face and body type. I hope we get to see this photoset soon!

  • 0

Lovely, lovely, lovely...

  • 0

Ellison is easily the single most stunningly beautiful woman on this site, IMO. Annett is her only competition.
On the one hand, it's a pity she doesn't do explicit poses.
On the other, I've read that brain researchers have determined that the visual system is wired such that looking at a beautiful woman's face directly stimulates the pleasure center of the brain, hence our obsession with gazing at beautiful faces... like Ellison's. Her beauty is truly world class, IMO.

  • 0

When I saw her first set, I felt that Ellison was easily the single most stunningly beautiful woman on this site. Annett is her only competition, IMO. This film only serves to support that opinion. It's a pity that she doesn't do explicit...

  • 0

I cannot play this movie.

  • 0

This movie is inaccessible for streaming or download.

  • 0

Wendy is absolutely adorable... I wish there was a translation or subtitles available!

  • 0

Homecoming/Prom Queen, Miss America Lovely...
Too bad no real pussy shots. *sigh* Oh well, her face and hair and body are so lovely to look at it almost makes up for that lack...

  • 0

Strange ~ but cute ~ name for a very foxy young lady. ( :
One question I have for you though, Clemens... you start her off in the set with an amazingly cute, sexy dress... but do not show any upskirt shots at all even though they would have been very easy with such a short skirt. I don't understand why you showed no upskirt whatsoever or even any of the undressing sequence.

  • 0

EXACTLY, Doug... what the F DO you ~ or I ~ know... actually know... about Kristel? Not even her real name, I wager... much less, anything about any of the photographers or other models.
Not that that's a bad thing.
IMO, they sell their images... that's all we know about them. Everything else is suggestion or projection.
And sometimes our ideas about them reveal much more about ourselves than anything about the models or the photographers.
Which is one reason I prefer not to speculate too deeply about these things. These models are real people with real lives who exist ~ half a world away ~ who I very likely will never meet in real life.
Such is life. For here and now, a surprising number of them give me some joy. ( : I like that, and I don't really invest very much more meaning into it than that.

  • 0

No, just not a native English speaker.

  • 0

Doug, are you forgetting the fact that neither Kristel nor Clemens is a native English speaker? They can hardly be expected to "feel" the connotations of English words the way we do.
Imagine if you were put in charge of coming up with set names in Russian... at best they would sound amusing to a Russian speaker, more likely they would end up sounding offensive.

  • 0

Clemens, I have one question:
With Roza wearing the sexy miniskirt, why did you only shoot one nice upskirt shot (# 21)? You could easily have shot 5 - 10 upskirt shots and still have had plenty of shots without the skirt.

  • 0

Shanna is HOT! I love her smile, her attitude, her personality, and of course her lovely body. I hope a lot more is on the way from this firecracker. ( :

  • 0

This is my favorite video on this site. Incredible!

  • 0

Lovely set of a lovely woman. ( :

  • 0

I see you beat me to it, Doug, and I was going to alert you on MA that Clemens had a set with your lady over here. ( :

  • 0

LOL

  • 0

Halena is a straight-up goddess. She rocks my world, every video, every set.

  • 0

Norma, you are never anything less than absolutely adorable...
I especially loved the upskirt shots, even though there were far too few and none from in front. ( :
Upskirt works really well with such a pretty dress!

  • 0

That's a cute costume, it makes me think of a naughty gymnast or figure skater.... ( :

  • 0

I dream of Barbara dancing a bellydance for me in that costume... ( : ( : ( :

  • 0

@_fer_realz_ always the same comments...go to met art...there are no fingers

  • 1

Recently I made two new photo sets with the girl.
She no longer touches herself and her pussy is perfectly visible in all angles.
Soon I will publish these sets here or on met-art.
I hope I made them as you wanted.

  • 0

I try different options.
It is important for me to understand what you like and what does not.

  • 0

Thank you for your help and active participation!

  • 0

I will try to do as you want as much as it does not contradict the wishes of others who write to my e-mail.
Thank you for your active participation and help!

  • 0

Soon I will publish video versions of these events, maybe they will like you more?
Thank you for your comments.
I will definitely rely more on them for my creativity in the future.

  • 0

I totally agree.
As soon as I shoot this girl again, I will take into account your wishes.
Thank you for the feedback.

  • 0

I'm sorry for this.
I'm working on my mistakes.
I'll do a long foreplay without fingers for some of my new sets.

  • 0

I will try to shoot beautiful pussy without fingers at the beginning,
and then a few fingers will not hurt, right?

  • 0

When I shoot the girl again, I will definitely make some sets, as you want!
Two more photo sets and a few videos will be with her fingers in the pussy, excuse me for this.

  • 0

I will try to make it better, but unfortunately most of the members want to see more than it would be just beautiful.
I hope you will forgive me the alternation of sets in different styles.
I will definitely shoot a lot of art!

  • 0

Thank you for your comments and suggestions!
I will try to do in the nearest my shooting, as you ask.

  • 0

I hope you found many galleries on this site that match your tastes, do not you?
If you want to see some special set or video with this model, then write to me: AntonioClemens.com@gmail.com
I will try to create such the set, as you write to me.
Thank you for your comments!

  • 9 months ago
  • 2

I understand your point but I don't see it in this set as you would perhaps on VT or SA, where I agree with you it can be too much. I thought more your complaint on Aggie's previous set would apply and again I see it as her invitingly holding open her panties and offering hidden secrets. I loved the set and Amy has such a wicked look that just says she wants to play.

  • 9 months ago
  • 1

Personally I thoroughly enjoyed the few shots there were of that style, a welcome change from the soft non revealing sets we get a lot of, which are lovely too. I thought them very well done, as though she is offering her beauty to us not so much as the in your face 'Hustler' style. We'll just have to differ on this one.

  • 1 year ago
  • 1

Yeah it is an amazing set, although I don't see the point of going that far & finishing without a 'money shot', it's like we were robbed of something :D

  • 2 years ago
  • 1

Yeah know what you mean, variety is the spice of life. Although Olivia is absolutely gorgeous & breaks the many 'pussy shy' intro's we've had lately with a bang. Sure hope we'll see plenty more of her.

  • 0

broken record

  • 2 years ago
  • 0

True fer realz, but poor girl seems to have made herself shaving sore, so don't forget a nice cooling, moisturising cream!!

  • 1

Hey fer_realz, I've noticed our tastes are fairly similar (with a few differences), and so I'm pretty much where you are with Ellison: for sheer "face that launched a thousand ships" beauty, she's one of the best working today. And it doesn't bother me that she won't do explicit shoots. Not with that face. And that body!

Perfection.

  • 1

She is incredible...

  • 0

I think we can know a bit more about Kristel than that she sells her images :-)
Through her pictures, her few words, and the words of others.
Just like we can know something about Antonio Clemens by looking at his images and this site.
There are facts to be gleaned :-))
But we would be wise like Socrates to know, to remember what we do not know :-)
Meanwhile, every action has a reaction in this world :-)
Kristel is a fascination of mine, and I'm giving it free reign, seeing where it leads.
It's a romance, and those things are built on hopes, dreams, illusions.
At bottom I feel or imagine a sympathy for her, seeing and understanding her as if I knew her intimately.
Yet because I don't, big unknowns remain :-) Maybe some will turn into knowns.
WTF do I know? :-))))
To some extent it depends on my interest.
And how long that lasts is another unknown :-)

  • 0

I would say both :-)))

  • 0

_fer_realz_, you got me to pay another buck! :-)

I doubt your assertion. Not that they aren't native English-speakers -- it's what's behind the choosing of these words.

Just take a look at the names of others sets here -- you can see when there's respect behind them, care, regard for something "higher" than whether somebody's pussy is wet, or whether she's a virgin. We can take one look at Kristel and discover for ourselves her small breasts -- no need to make that the title of a set, as if that's all that matters.

My impression is that Clemens does not respect at least some of these girls, and may actually dislike or even hate them. They're tools of his trade, tho -- they're desperate for attention and he takes advantage of that.

It all depends on what he wants to promote too. Thus we have the titles of the latest sets of Nicole and Barbara. Very nice. Very kind. I guess he thinks they need his help :-)
Or at least that he needs theirs :-)))

What I suspect in Kristel's case is that she left him like she left Rylsky, and he's mad at her. Resents her. So let me reiterate, Kristel: Run! :-))

You could do worse, babe, than someday let Rylsky shoot you again. I think the resulting photos would be extreeem-ly interesting :-)

Now, if Kristel OK'd the names of her sets with a smile, or even was the source of them, I applaud her sense of humor! All bets are off! :-)))
She would be even less the girl I thought -- should say hoped wishfully -- she was, but what the f do I know? :-)))

  • 1

I keep an eye out for signs of my lady :-)))