Stunning 18
Your Pages Recently Viewed
Your Content Recently Viewed

_fer_realz_ Comments

  • 0

What's with all the fingers lately ~ is this Stunning18, or is this Hustler?

  • 0

Please stop ruining the best photos of the best poses by putting the model's fingers in the way.

  • 0

Too much fingering and spreading. I want to see a model's pussy, not her fingers and not spreading or penetration. If I wanted to see spreading and penetration, I'd buy Hustler.

  • 1

Please, no more shots where the models' fingers obstruct our view of their pussies.

  • 3

You make your points well, Fozzinsky. I got so frustrated by years of American porn mags that feature absolutely lovely models but ruin almost every single shot because they mandate that the model be spreading in every shot. I got so sick and tired of that style that it was a true miracle of pleasure to discover MA and its family sites, which at the time I subscribed (2010) did not feature fingers or toys in pics.

I felt that it was a way of making an erotic statement: we don't have to use cheap tricks to make our photos more exciting because our models are exciting and sexy enough. No tricks, no feigned sexual pleasure, just the pleasure of viewing our models unobstructed.

Now in 2016 virtually every MA family site is featuring more and more finger photos and it is frustrating as hell to me. I know that the MA management see this as a move forward but I see it as a diminishment of a beautiful product, a step backwards.

The finger photos are yet another way of making the undisputed leader of the industry just another cheap porn product, IMO.

  • 3

Why ruin what would be a good set by having the model obstruct our views by putting her fingers on and in her pussy? We want to see her pussy, not her fingers.

  • 3

If I wanted to see finger-spread photography, I'd buy a copy of Hustler. This is disappointing. Stunning18 is so much better than Hustler, at least until it starts using the same techniques.

  • 0

Too many fingers. I can look at pretty girls' fingers any day anywhere I am. What I want to see here is her pussy, not her fingers.

  • 0

Gorgeous model. This could have been an excellent photoset rather than just a nice one.

1) What's with all the fingers? All the sudden all the MA family sites are turning into Hustler-wannabe sites. I like MA and I liked the MA sites because I could clearly see the models' features without the fingers being in all the shots. You are so much better than Hustler, PLEASE don't turn into a Hustler wannabe site.

2) Beautiful outfit ~ pretty dress, sexy undies and heels. BUT no upskirt shots. The shoes are removed almost immediately. The thong is removed before we can even see the model's bottom in the thong.

This could have been an excellent set but for the attempt to imitate the American finger-spread style of porn which is cheap and obscures the models' features, and the haste to remove the clothing and heels.

  • 0

Toys, or fingers ~ if it covers up her pussy, it ruins the photoshoot.

  • 0

Too bad we never get to see April's pussy. I can see a pretty girl's fingers any day of the week.

  • 0

Please don't let excessive finger action become the trend here at Stunning 18.... I can see beautiful women's fingers any day of the week, all I have to do is go to class or go to work. (: What I don't get to see is their lovely private parts, and in a photoset, when fingers get involved, the private parts get obscured.

Of course not everyone agrees with me on this, but that's my opinion and my vote. (:

  • 0

Too bad about the fingers, we never got to see Kama's pussy from the front, only from the rear. The panties were extra hot, and the rear views were great but I wanted to see her nice bits from the front as well without fingers blocking the view.

  • 0

Ohhh man I wish I could bump uglies with Dolores... well, bump (my) ugly with her pretty... (;

  • 0

April's scorching hot. (: This set could easily have been twice as long and I would have been captivated to the end. Much better "flow" in this set than the norm here, it flows really logically through a series of connected movements. I would still like to see more shots of the really nice poses. And unfortunately in the best poses, April's fingers block our view of the nice bits in this set.

  • 1

Some nice spicy poses of a lovely young lady, but the problem is it's way too ADD ~ only 2 to 3 shots in sequence of a given pose, and when it's a nice revealing pose, I want to see a long sequence. And way too many "filler" shots that don't show anything.

As a result, I'm much more frustrated than satisfied by this set. Yes, I'm tantalized. Yes, I'm left wanting more. But I didn't get near enough of what I wanted to see to be satisfied.

  • 0

So many fingers in the way when what I wanted to see was not fingers...

  • 3

Well.... that escalated quickly! An unexpected surprise indeed...

  • 0

Lalovv's masturbation video is the gold standard by which I judge all Stunning18 masturbation videos... this one is very close to that gold standard, or it might match it. I guess I need to watch again to determine.... (:

  • 0

Just a tad heavy on the rouge, otherwise a lovely set of a lovely woman.

  • 0

OMG Thanks for the lovely lingerie shots, especially those pretty panties!!!

  • 2

She's definitely a charmer, and definitely sensual as hell, but OMG that camera work was so awful it had to be intentional.

  • 3

Amelia is absolutely stunning, but it is disappointing that Stunning18 is running so many pussy shy sets lately. It's frustrating to see such gorgeous women and not be able to see all their intimate assets.

  • 1

I agree, Fozzinsky, I hope Olivia comes back soon and often!

  • 1

Wow... what's with all the rail-thin models lately? Mind you, I like a skinny girl like Olivia, who's quite gorgeous... but I like women with meat on their bones and bountiful, generous curves too.

  • 0

Yep, and I'm going to keep asking the question, I hope someday Antonio will answer. I'm sure he's got a reason, I don't expect him to change his practices just for me. But, I just want to hear his reason.

  • 0

Again, I just don't get it, Mr. Clemens...

You've got a gorgeous model in a cute, frilly, flirty dress with a short skirt... and you don't take any upskirt shots? The one shot where she's lifting her skirt is nice, but that's not an upskirt shot.

Otherwise, a very nice set.

  • 0

Yum yum!!!

Antonio, why don't you ever shoot upskirt shots, even when your model is wearing a pretty dress or skirt and reclining on a chair? Do you not like upskirt? Do you feel uncomfortable with it? Or does it just not strike you as erotic?

  • 2

Melena, the incredible cutie who just happens to be a world-class sex kitten... see the final sequence on the chest to see what I mean. I like how she doesn't look as polished or professional in this set and lets a lot of feeling through. Oh, and those polka dot panties are HOT. ( :

  • 0

Poor girl did a horrible shave job. I'd happily have given her a touch-up!

  • 0

I second the PP Club nomination, LLC!!!

  • 0

Antonio, thanks for including the upskirt shots with that cute dress! They were quite delicious... ( :

  • 0

Damn right! That is the prototypical PP!!

  • 0

Pretty face... gorgeous body... fascinating tattoos.... ( ;

  • 1

I'm no fan of that nightmare of a set... but I AM a fan of the model. Holy cow, Diana is gorgeous, and a natural. I hope to see plenty from her. ( :

  • 2

Yes! More Solana!!!

  • 0

Antonio, I'm confused... Lisa's wearing such a pretty skirt and you only took one upskirt shot? It was a really nice shot, but more would be appreciated.

  • 3

Photo test?

Harper passes with an A+!

  • 2

Too many "fingers" shots.... makes it hard to see her intimate parts!

  • 0

I gotta admit I agree with you, l_l_c ~ the name for this set is a total misnomer.

I have no problem at all with G/G sets, even ones not depicting sexual activity. It's nice to see two beautiful female bodies next to and interacting with each other even when the interaction is obviously not sexual. However, the name of this set implies something that is not there, and that is its weakness. Had it merely been entitled "Play" I would have had no problem at all with it.

  • 0

Alice is HOT. You should try her out on MA, Antonio...

  • 1

Alice is AMAZING. Cute, beautiful, sexy, and what a PP. I hope you got plenty of sets with her, Antonio!

  • 1

Such a lovely lady... everything is sexy about this woman, right down to her voice and her giggle. ( : Once again, I wish I knew how to speak Russian... ( :

  • 1

Not that everything about this woman isn't scorchingly sexy, but damn, her hair is soooo sexy in this set! Mmmm! Katie's such a looker!

I'm not a huge fan of the bow tats, but I have to admit the one on her foot is pretty damn cool. ( :

  • 1

I think Clemens needs to get a better translation program... in my book, "actually having a butt" and "having the body fat of the average woman" does not translate to "chubby." ( :

  • 1

I think Clemens needs to get a better translation program... in my book, "actually having a butt" and "having the body fat of the average woman" does not translate to "chubby." ( :

  • 0

EXACTLY, Doug... what the F DO you ~ or I ~ know... actually know... about Kristel? Not even her real name, I wager... much less, anything about any of the photographers or other models.
Not that that's a bad thing.
IMO, they sell their images... that's all we know about them. Everything else is suggestion or projection.
And sometimes our ideas about them reveal much more about ourselves than anything about the models or the photographers.
Which is one reason I prefer not to speculate too deeply about these things. These models are real people with real lives who exist ~ half a world away ~ who I very likely will never meet in real life.
Such is life. For here and now, a surprising number of them give me some joy. ( : I like that, and I don't really invest very much more meaning into it than that.

  • 0

Doug, are you forgetting the fact that neither Kristel nor Clemens is a native English speaker? They can hardly be expected to "feel" the connotations of English words the way we do.
Imagine if you were put in charge of coming up with set names in Russian... at best they would sound amusing to a Russian speaker, more likely they would end up sounding offensive.

  • 3

You make your points well, Fozzinsky. I got so frustrated by years of American porn mags that feature absolutely lovely models but ruin almost every single shot because they mandate that the model be spreading in every shot. I got so sick and tired of that style that it was a true miracle of pleasure to discover MA and its family sites, which at the time I subscribed (2010) did not feature fingers or toys in pics.

I felt that it was a way of making an erotic statement: we don't have to use cheap tricks to make our photos more exciting because our models are exciting and sexy enough. No tricks, no feigned sexual pleasure, just the pleasure of viewing our models unobstructed.

Now in 2016 virtually every MA family site is featuring more and more finger photos and it is frustrating as hell to me. I know that the MA management see this as a move forward but I see it as a diminishment of a beautiful product, a step backwards.

The finger photos are yet another way of making the undisputed leader of the industry just another cheap porn product, IMO.

  • 3

Why ruin what would be a good set by having the model obstruct our views by putting her fingers on and in her pussy? We want to see her pussy, not her fingers.

  • 3

If I wanted to see finger-spread photography, I'd buy a copy of Hustler. This is disappointing. Stunning18 is so much better than Hustler, at least until it starts using the same techniques.

  • 3

Well.... that escalated quickly! An unexpected surprise indeed...

  • 3

Amelia is absolutely stunning, but it is disappointing that Stunning18 is running so many pussy shy sets lately. It's frustrating to see such gorgeous women and not be able to see all their intimate assets.

  • 3

Photo test?

Harper passes with an A+!

  • 2

She's definitely a charmer, and definitely sensual as hell, but OMG that camera work was so awful it had to be intentional.

  • 2

Melena, the incredible cutie who just happens to be a world-class sex kitten... see the final sequence on the chest to see what I mean. I like how she doesn't look as polished or professional in this set and lets a lot of feeling through. Oh, and those polka dot panties are HOT. ( :

  • 2

Yes! More Solana!!!

  • 2

Too many "fingers" shots.... makes it hard to see her intimate parts!

  • 2

Melena is a testament to the power of cute! Her cute personality makes her 1000 X sexier than she'd be if she were dead serious. ( :

  • 1

Please, no more shots where the models' fingers obstruct our view of their pussies.

  • 1

Some nice spicy poses of a lovely young lady, but the problem is it's way too ADD ~ only 2 to 3 shots in sequence of a given pose, and when it's a nice revealing pose, I want to see a long sequence. And way too many "filler" shots that don't show anything.

As a result, I'm much more frustrated than satisfied by this set. Yes, I'm tantalized. Yes, I'm left wanting more. But I didn't get near enough of what I wanted to see to be satisfied.

  • 1

I agree, Fozzinsky, I hope Olivia comes back soon and often!

  • 1

Wow... what's with all the rail-thin models lately? Mind you, I like a skinny girl like Olivia, who's quite gorgeous... but I like women with meat on their bones and bountiful, generous curves too.

  • 1

I'm no fan of that nightmare of a set... but I AM a fan of the model. Holy cow, Diana is gorgeous, and a natural. I hope to see plenty from her. ( :

  • 1

Alice is AMAZING. Cute, beautiful, sexy, and what a PP. I hope you got plenty of sets with her, Antonio!

  • 1

Such a lovely lady... everything is sexy about this woman, right down to her voice and her giggle. ( : Once again, I wish I knew how to speak Russian... ( :

  • 1

Not that everything about this woman isn't scorchingly sexy, but damn, her hair is soooo sexy in this set! Mmmm! Katie's such a looker!

I'm not a huge fan of the bow tats, but I have to admit the one on her foot is pretty damn cool. ( :

  • 1

I think Clemens needs to get a better translation program... in my book, "actually having a butt" and "having the body fat of the average woman" does not translate to "chubby." ( :

  • 1

I think Clemens needs to get a better translation program... in my book, "actually having a butt" and "having the body fat of the average woman" does not translate to "chubby." ( :

  • 1

Waaay too short... please shoot a longer video of this gorgeous young lady pleasuring herself! ( :

  • 1

Great panty shots, particularly from behind while Melena is bent over. More like that in future shoots, please! ( :

  • 0

What's with all the fingers lately ~ is this Stunning18, or is this Hustler?

  • 0

Please stop ruining the best photos of the best poses by putting the model's fingers in the way.

  • 0

Too much fingering and spreading. I want to see a model's pussy, not her fingers and not spreading or penetration. If I wanted to see spreading and penetration, I'd buy Hustler.

  • 0

Too many fingers. I can look at pretty girls' fingers any day anywhere I am. What I want to see here is her pussy, not her fingers.

  • 0

Gorgeous model. This could have been an excellent photoset rather than just a nice one.

1) What's with all the fingers? All the sudden all the MA family sites are turning into Hustler-wannabe sites. I like MA and I liked the MA sites because I could clearly see the models' features without the fingers being in all the shots. You are so much better than Hustler, PLEASE don't turn into a Hustler wannabe site.

2) Beautiful outfit ~ pretty dress, sexy undies and heels. BUT no upskirt shots. The shoes are removed almost immediately. The thong is removed before we can even see the model's bottom in the thong.

This could have been an excellent set but for the attempt to imitate the American finger-spread style of porn which is cheap and obscures the models' features, and the haste to remove the clothing and heels.

  • 0

Toys, or fingers ~ if it covers up her pussy, it ruins the photoshoot.

  • 0

Too bad we never get to see April's pussy. I can see a pretty girl's fingers any day of the week.

  • 0

Please don't let excessive finger action become the trend here at Stunning 18.... I can see beautiful women's fingers any day of the week, all I have to do is go to class or go to work. (: What I don't get to see is their lovely private parts, and in a photoset, when fingers get involved, the private parts get obscured.

Of course not everyone agrees with me on this, but that's my opinion and my vote. (:

  • 0

Too bad about the fingers, we never got to see Kama's pussy from the front, only from the rear. The panties were extra hot, and the rear views were great but I wanted to see her nice bits from the front as well without fingers blocking the view.

  • 0

Ohhh man I wish I could bump uglies with Dolores... well, bump (my) ugly with her pretty... (;

  • 0

April's scorching hot. (: This set could easily have been twice as long and I would have been captivated to the end. Much better "flow" in this set than the norm here, it flows really logically through a series of connected movements. I would still like to see more shots of the really nice poses. And unfortunately in the best poses, April's fingers block our view of the nice bits in this set.

  • 0

So many fingers in the way when what I wanted to see was not fingers...

  • 0

Lalovv's masturbation video is the gold standard by which I judge all Stunning18 masturbation videos... this one is very close to that gold standard, or it might match it. I guess I need to watch again to determine.... (:

  • 0

Just a tad heavy on the rouge, otherwise a lovely set of a lovely woman.

  • 0

OMG Thanks for the lovely lingerie shots, especially those pretty panties!!!

  • 0

Yep, and I'm going to keep asking the question, I hope someday Antonio will answer. I'm sure he's got a reason, I don't expect him to change his practices just for me. But, I just want to hear his reason.

  • 0

Again, I just don't get it, Mr. Clemens...

You've got a gorgeous model in a cute, frilly, flirty dress with a short skirt... and you don't take any upskirt shots? The one shot where she's lifting her skirt is nice, but that's not an upskirt shot.

Otherwise, a very nice set.

  • 0

Yum yum!!!

Antonio, why don't you ever shoot upskirt shots, even when your model is wearing a pretty dress or skirt and reclining on a chair? Do you not like upskirt? Do you feel uncomfortable with it? Or does it just not strike you as erotic?

  • 0

Poor girl did a horrible shave job. I'd happily have given her a touch-up!

  • 0

I second the PP Club nomination, LLC!!!

  • 0

Antonio, thanks for including the upskirt shots with that cute dress! They were quite delicious... ( :

  • 0

Damn right! That is the prototypical PP!!

  • 0

Pretty face... gorgeous body... fascinating tattoos.... ( ;

  • 0

Antonio, I'm confused... Lisa's wearing such a pretty skirt and you only took one upskirt shot? It was a really nice shot, but more would be appreciated.

  • 0

I gotta admit I agree with you, l_l_c ~ the name for this set is a total misnomer.

I have no problem at all with G/G sets, even ones not depicting sexual activity. It's nice to see two beautiful female bodies next to and interacting with each other even when the interaction is obviously not sexual. However, the name of this set implies something that is not there, and that is its weakness. Had it merely been entitled "Play" I would have had no problem at all with it.

  • 0

Alice is HOT. You should try her out on MA, Antonio...

  • 0

pretty sure its just a title.

  • 0

I will try to do as you want as much as it does not contradict the wishes of others who write to my e-mail.
Thank you for your active participation and help!

  • 0

I'm sorry for this.
I'm working on my mistakes.
I'll do a long foreplay without fingers for some of my new sets.

  • 0

I will try to shoot beautiful pussy without fingers at the beginning,
and then a few fingers will not hurt, right?

  • 2

I understand your point but I don't see it in this set as you would perhaps on VT or SA, where I agree with you it can be too much. I thought more your complaint on Aggie's previous set would apply and again I see it as her invitingly holding open her panties and offering hidden secrets. I loved the set and Amy has such a wicked look that just says she wants to play.

  • 1

Personally I thoroughly enjoyed the few shots there were of that style, a welcome change from the soft non revealing sets we get a lot of, which are lovely too. I thought them very well done, as though she is offering her beauty to us not so much as the in your face 'Hustler' style. We'll just have to differ on this one.

  • 1

Yeah it is an amazing set, although I don't see the point of going that far & finishing without a 'money shot', it's like we were robbed of something :D

  • 1

Yeah know what you mean, variety is the spice of life. Although Olivia is absolutely gorgeous & breaks the many 'pussy shy' intro's we've had lately with a bang. Sure hope we'll see plenty more of her.

  • 0

broken record

  • 0

True fer realz, but poor girl seems to have made herself shaving sore, so don't forget a nice cooling, moisturising cream!!

  • 0

I think we can know a bit more about Kristel than that she sells her images :-)
Through her pictures, her few words, and the words of others.
Just like we can know something about Antonio Clemens by looking at his images and this site.
There are facts to be gleaned :-))
But we would be wise like Socrates to know, to remember what we do not know :-)
Meanwhile, every action has a reaction in this world :-)
Kristel is a fascination of mine, and I'm giving it free reign, seeing where it leads.
It's a romance, and those things are built on hopes, dreams, illusions.
At bottom I feel or imagine a sympathy for her, seeing and understanding her as if I knew her intimately.
Yet because I don't, big unknowns remain :-) Maybe some will turn into knowns.
WTF do I know? :-))))
To some extent it depends on my interest.
And how long that lasts is another unknown :-)

  • 0

_fer_realz_, you got me to pay another buck! :-)

I doubt your assertion. Not that they aren't native English-speakers -- it's what's behind the choosing of these words.

Just take a look at the names of others sets here -- you can see when there's respect behind them, care, regard for something "higher" than whether somebody's pussy is wet, or whether she's a virgin. We can take one look at Kristel and discover for ourselves her small breasts -- no need to make that the title of a set, as if that's all that matters.

My impression is that Clemens does not respect at least some of these girls, and may actually dislike or even hate them. They're tools of his trade, tho -- they're desperate for attention and he takes advantage of that.

It all depends on what he wants to promote too. Thus we have the titles of the latest sets of Nicole and Barbara. Very nice. Very kind. I guess he thinks they need his help :-)
Or at least that he needs theirs :-)))

What I suspect in Kristel's case is that she left him like she left Rylsky, and he's mad at her. Resents her. So let me reiterate, Kristel: Run! :-))

You could do worse, babe, than someday let Rylsky shoot you again. I think the resulting photos would be extreeem-ly interesting :-)

Now, if Kristel OK'd the names of her sets with a smile, or even was the source of them, I applaud her sense of humor! All bets are off! :-)))
She would be even less the girl I thought -- should say hoped wishfully -- she was, but what the f do I know? :-)))

  • 1

I keep an eye out for signs of my lady :-)))